~~~Caged ~~~

~~~Caged ~~~
Gorillas Fighting 4 Change

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

The Oath of a Doctor working in Solitary Confinement


A Doctor’s Challenge – the Hippocratic Oath in Solitary Confinement



It has been said by many that the medical field is an honorable profession that has high standards as well as high expectations. There are many ethical values within the trade and those most common are: the patient has the right to refuse or choose their treatment – a practitioner should act in the best interest of the patient – “first do no harm”  - concerns the distribution of scarce health resources, and the decision who get what treatment (fairness and equality) – the patient and the person treating the patient have the right to be treated with dignity – the concept of informed consent has increased -

Doctors who work in public owned prisons face an ethical difficulty every day. Their biggest challenge is working in a dismal environment that seeks loyalty to employers rather than the patients. The prison rules are strict and cruel for those who break the code.

Confronted with daily challenges, doctors and nurses are increasingly stressed to look the other way and mistreat or delay treatment of prisoners housed in solitary confinement. This quandary is most complex and perplexing and not easy to correct without impacting ethic related situations related to the treatment of these prisoners that are isolated from general population and subject to obvious psychological and physical harm while housed there.

It is not easy to define torture yet when the mentally ill are housed here in these isolation cells, every minute they spent there is torture. The substandard living conditions and obvious barriers between patient and provider create deep chasms that are hard to fill despite individual efforts to bring the problems to the surface occasionally without serious harm or consequences. Professional attention is precious as time doesn’t allow much interactions and thorough examination for those housed in solitary confinement.

Solitary confinement has been deemed to be a combination of stress, anxiety, depression and hopelessness. Some claim no harm is done even during prolonged or long term placements but clinical evidence is pointing to a different direction as prisoners deal with constant psychological and physical torture to withstand these stressors and overcome or survive their existence within these darkened corridors and walls.

Many have been locked away for decades and have already submitted to the ever increasing pressure to remain human beings instead of becoming animals. Their mere existence within these isolation cell areas creates violence and more difficult conditions for staff to handle. This is most difficult for medical providers as their safety is never assured when treating one of these isolation prisoners no matter how heavily shackled they are when they arrive at the infirmary strapped tightly onto a steel gurney with straps for the legs, the hands and the head along with spit masks or other protective gear in place to avoid harm.

Strangely enough, such a trip outside of their cell is a luxury many will brag about as they are locked inside their cells 23 hours a day with perhaps 6 hours out for the week based on good behavior or staffing available.  Living inside these small cells for such duration alone can turn any man insane for wanting to claw out of their concrete box called a cell to be free to move around a little, smell fresh air for a quick breath and feel the sunshine on their face for just momentary satisfaction he is still alive.

The adverse living conditions inside solitary confinement are significant factors to recognize for doctors and psychologists assigned there for the purpose of treating the mentally ill and the behavioral disruptive prisoners. They are exposed psychotic episodes, suicides, and much too frequently self-harm gestures or serious unstable where prisoners decompensate because of this isolation creating crisis care almost 24 / 7 seven days a week. Since the option of sending them to a psychiatric hospital is rarely provided, they must move them to suicide watch cells where correctional staff is assigned to watch them and preserve life if possible. Needless to say, the odds of these prisoners getting better are almost nil to say the least.

Medical and mental health providers rarely have the ability to mitigate fully the impact or harm created by isolation. Mental healthcare is limited and only provided as a means to ensure compliance with psychotropic medication that are “watch and swallow” but time does not allow thorough inspections of the “swallow” thus many may “cheek” their meds and trade them for something else.

Exams are rare [ and usually done off-site] and based on critical status rather than preventive or routine. There are no in-cell programs thus the occasional visit by a nurse or doctor is welcomed with numerous complaints of pains, aches etc. just to get the attention of another human being that is standing close to them without the bars blocking their view or even brief contact as they take their vitals and temp to record the visit as being performed.

The use of isolation cells is not the question here. The use of segregation to confine the mentally ill is also not the main interest in this presentation. The main focus of this article is the lack of care provided due to strict physical plant limitations, the non-existence of sound facilities for both medical and mental health treatment services and the lack of adequate staffing to deal with this huge number of prisoners kept in isolation cell areas in many states.

Because of these limitations, many prisoners do not get the required care as needed and are often at risk for complications or infections due to the delay of treatment and the inability to treat them as often as necessary to meet mandated standards of care established for both medical and psychological professionals hired to do the job to take care of prisoners in solitary confinement. These contributors to more dysfunctional and disabled persons inside the isolation cell areas impact preventive care and intervention methods to adequately do their jobs.

Their jobs are difficult by any standard. They work with persons neglected and out of scope of normality thus acting bizarre, annoying or even potentially dangerous as they reach out for help in their own manner or fashion to be treated.

One must wonder if their oath applies when assigned within one of these isolation cell areas and if their ethics can be compromised because of limitations imposed by their employer and the associated budgeting and staffing associated with the delivery of proper care and meeting minimum medical standards of care as established by those who took the oath.


No comments:

Post a Comment